Is There A Duty To Have A Green Workplace?

With the global spotlight on reducing greenhouse gases and carbon footprints, including the Obama Administration’s unprecedented attention on encouraging environmental conservation and development of renewable energy sources, it’s clear that we’re in a “go green” era.

To cut to the question posed in this blogposts’s title, the answer is “no”.  There is no legal duty, at the moment, for a private employer to “go green”.  Perhaps at some point in the future, statutory authority such as the federal Occupational Safety & Health Act and state and local counterparts will include “green workplace standards”.  For example, with respect to the investment in “green jobs” the Department of Labor and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health are already focusing on ensuring that OSHA standards are appropriately designed and enforced to protect workers performing that type of work.  At present, however, there are no mandates and instead only various governmental and non-governmental incentives for a workplace to go green. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPAand Pew Center on Global Climate Change estimate that commercial buildings account for nearly half of all energy consumption in the U.S., and contribute to nearly half of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.  The Energy Star Program, administered by the EPA and U.S. Department of Energy, attempts to encourage energy efficiency in buildings to meet strict energy performance standards set by EPA and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  Federal buildings are eligible to receive a High Performance Building designation. 

In addition, commercial real estate and private companies are leading the green charge through voluntary compliance with standards set by a private, nonprofit membership organization, the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). The USGBC’s LEED® (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System™ awards points for satisfying specified green building criteria. The six major environmental categories of review include: 

  • Sustainable Sites
  • Water Efficiency
  • Energy and Atmosphere
  •  Materials and Resources
  • Indoor Environmental Quality and
  • Innovation and Design

A building, or unit therein, can be certified as LEED Silver, Gold, or Platinum based on the total number of points earned within each LEED category.  For example, our firm’s Miami and Los Angeles offices are in buildings with LEED Gold certification.  It was reported two days ago that a high profile commercial property investment company will spend up to $10 million retrofitting its properties for environmental sustainability.  LEED can be applied to all building types including new construction, individual unit commercial interiors, core & shell developments, existing buildings, homes, neighborhood developments, schools and retail facilities.  In addition, LEED for Healthcare was released in early 2008.

In sum, the green movement has not yet resulted in mandated private employer obligations.  Notwithstanding the lack of affirmative duty to do so, however, based on information provided by the USGBC and EPA there are many pragmatic benefits that employers should consider for greening their workplaces:

  • Monetary:  Funding and tax incentives 
  • Energy Efficiency:   Using energy more efficiently may save operating costs on utility bills over the life of the building; reduce the cost per unit on manufactured goods and services; and enhance resale and lease value of real estate
  • Environmental Efficiency:   Reducing environmental impact may reduce waste materials and disposal costs, water usage, chemical use and disposal costs; encourage recycling and reuse of materials; develops local markets for locally produced materials, saving on transportation costs and develops economy-of-scale price reductions
  • Human Efficiency:   Improving indoor environment, producing healthier places to work leading to increases productivity; reduction in absenteeism; boosting morale and corporate loyalty (also through creation of corporate “green teams”), and reduction in employee turnover
  • Goodwill:  Green Buildings often receive high profile notoriety and increased public perception of goodwill toward employees and the community.  

 

Will Paid Sick Leave Be Mandated By Law?

The H1N1 swine flu pandemic, which has infected as many as 22 million Americans, hospitalizing 98,000 and killing roughly 3,900 since it first broke out in April, has prompted legislative discussion about mandating paid sick leave at the federal and state level and in some cities such as New York City.   In spite of admonitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to workers to stay at home if they are sick, some say that the lack of paid sick leave has created an obstacle. CDC statistics show that a sick employee in the workplace risks infecting 10 percent of their colleagues – the so-called “presenteeism” paradox of causing more economic loss than absenteeism. However, approximately 39 percent of all workers in private industry do not get paid sick leave, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Of course, the statistics differ as to full-time versus part-time workers: 73 percent of full-time workers receive paid sick leave benefits compared to only 26 percent of part-time workers in private industry.

Currently, there are no federal legal requirements for paid sick leave. For companies subject to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Act does require unpaid sick leave. The FMLA provides for up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for a “serious health condition” of either the employee or the employee’s spouse, son, daughter, or parent. In many instances, paid leave may be substituted for unpaid FMLA leave. Employees are eligible to take FMLA leave if they have worked for their employer for at least 12 months, and have worked for at least 1,250 hours over the previous 12 months, and work at a worksite where at least 50 employees are employed by the employer within 75 miles of that worksite.

Federal Legislative Proposals

Several bills have been proposed at the federal level to mandate paid sick leave, and warrant your close attention during this pandemic.  The Emergency Influenza Containment Act (H.R. 3991) proposed by Reps. George Miller and Lynn Woolsey of California on November 3, would require employers to provide at least five paid sick days to workers who are sent home from work ill or told to stay home because of symptoms related to contagious illnesses such as the H1N1 flu virus. Under this bill, employees could only take time off for their own illness.

The Pandemic Protection for Workers, Families and Businesses Act (S. 2790/H.R. 4092), proposed by Sen. Christopher Dodd and Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut on November 17, would require seven days paid sick leave they fall ill with swine flu or seasonal flu and would include parents who stay home with sick children. (The Dodd-DeLauro bill is packaged as an emergency measure but is largely based on The Healthy Families Act, which was introduced last May in the House (H.R. 2460) by Rep. DeLauro and in the Senate (S. 1152) by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy.)

Another key difference between the two is that under the Miller-Woolsey bill, the sick days would go into effect if an employer tells a worker to go home or stay home.  Under the Dodd-DeLauro bill, an employee would decide when to use the days. Under both bills, businesses with fewer than 15 employees would be exempt, and both bills would sunset after two years. 

Some senators have announced opposition to such legislation, arguing it would hurt the already aching economy by imposing inflexible policies and new financial burdens on small businesses.  In addition, many employers already offer paid sick leave, or make other arrangements, such as telework, to mitigate outbreaks of contagious illnesses. Counter-arguments in favor of the legislation are that workers should not have to choose between getting paid or staying home ill, and employers might end up with dozens of unproductive, sick workers making their co-workers unproductive.

State Laws

At least a dozen states reportedly have considered or are considering whether to mandate a certain amount of paid sick leave per year. New York is not one of them. For an update on those campaigns, see the National Partnership for Women & Families and the Healthy Families Act Coalition website. 


New York City

In New York City, the Paid Sick Time Act (Int. No. 1059) was introduced in August and is currently pending in hearings before the Committee on Civil Service and Labor. That bill would require employers in New York City with 10 or more employees to give employees one hour of sick leave for every thirty hours worked -- up to 9 paid sick days per year. Small businesses (fewer than 10 employees) would be required to give up to 5 paid sick days per year. Under the bill, sick days could be used when the employee is sick or to allow the employee to care for sick children or other sick relatives. The bill also has a provision allowing sick days to be used to care for children whose schools have been closed by city officials for public health reasons, even if the children are not themselves sick.

Considerations For Employers

The passage of such legislation will require those employers subject to the laws to revisit their existing paid time off (PTO) policies to ensure compliance. And for those employers without PTO policies, such legislation will require immediate implementation of policies compliant with the mandated minimum amount of sick leave. In the meantime, employers should continue to monitor guidance provided by the CDC and the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). These agencies have issued fact sheets designed to help employers and workers promote safety during the H1N1 pandemic, and minimize proliferation of H1N1 in the workplace.  According to OSHA, all employers should be implementing a combination of control methods to protect workers and reduce the transmission of the H1N1 virus in the workplace, including:

  • encouraging sick workers to stay home
  • promoting hand hygiene and cough etiquette
  • keeping the workplace clean
  • promoting vaccination and addressing travel and
  • planning for additional actions if the severity of the pandemic increases.

Swine Flu: Another Reason to Telecommute? Some Relevant Legal Issues & Guidance

I am also a contributing author to the New York Employment Law Letter. In its September 2009 issue I wrote about the resurgence of telecommuting for various reasons, including efforts to reduce company overhead while increasing productivity during the recession. See Telecommuting: What employers need to know about managing offsite workers.

Now an official pandemic, the H1N1 Swine Flu is forecasted to have a resurgence this fall and winter which may be another reason to offer a telecommuting option to employees. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has published useful guidance for businesses on managing the workplace in relation to this pandemic. Indeed, one of the CDC's recommendations includes: "Establish policies for flexible worksite (e.g., telecommuting) and flexible work hours (e.g., staggered shifts), if needed." And yes, even the U.S. Occupational Safety &

Health Administration has published helpful guidance in ensuring a safe workplace in the face of this global pandemic.

While telecommuting is easily justified, there are myriad legal issues involved that warrant review of the resources cited here.

Some of those include: (i) Telecommuting as a "Reasonable Accommodation" of a Disability; (ii) Discrimination/ Eligibility Issues; (iii) Wage and Hour Issues (travel, standby time, downtime); (iv) Workplace Safety (ergonomics, OSHA compliance, workers compensation, third party liability); (v) Commercial, General Liability, Homeowners Insurance; and (vi) Protection of Confidential and Proprietary Data; (vii) Telecommuting Policies and Agreements.

Keep Your Employment Law Issues Cool During Dog Days of Summer

In July 2006 New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg issued an Executive Order declaring a State of Emergency "because of the extreme temperatures and humidity being experienced by the City." Mayor Bloomberg advised that "extreme conditions can cause heat exhaustion and heat stroke in residents [and] the increased demand for electricity for residents and businesses to run air conditioners and other cooling devices can cause power disruptions. These conditions imperil public safety and health."

That summer, 140 deaths in New York City were attributed to heat stroke or medical conditions exacerbated by extreme heat. Unfortunately, some weather experts expect this summer to be hotter and/or more humid than average.

From an employment law perspective, there are practical ways for you to keep your cool during a heat wave by planning ahead for such conditions, developing appropriate policies and procedures, maintaining safe and comfortable working conditions, maintaining employee productivity, preventing workplace heat-related illnesses or injuries, and complying with relevant employment and safety laws and regulations.

What is extreme heat?

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) defines a "heat wave" as a "prolonged period of excessive heat, often combined with excessive humidity." FEMA advises that extreme heat pushes the human body beyond its limits by slowing body evaporation and causing it to work extra hard to maintain a normal temperature. The public health hazard is serious enough for the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to publish a safety brochure titled Heat Wave: A Major Summer Killer.

Even greater hazards in cities

The potential for heat-related problems in urban areas like New York City is even greater. Asphalt and concrete store heat longer and gradually release it at night, producing higher nighttime temperatures, known as the "urban heat island effect." My dogs Dublin and Gepetto, pictured above, enjoy getting out of Manhattan every weekend in the summer for this very reason. Indeed, the New York City Office of Emergency Management (NYCOEM) has issued a brochure, Ready New York: Beat The Heat, which warns that "on warm summer days, the City can be as much as 10 degrees warmer than surrounding areas . . . [as] [t]he City's infrastructure -- largely made up of asphalt, concrete and metal -- traps the heat, leading to higher temperatures."

Issues and recommendations for the private employer

While employers have no control over Mother Nature, they can and should take appropriate steps to protect the health, safety, and welfare of their employees in anticipation of and during heat-wave conditions. Private- sector employees in New York are covered by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act). Neither the OSH Act nor the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has a specific provision or regulation regarding heat stress. The OSH Act's General Duty Clause, however, requires employers to "furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees." OSHA has used the General Duty Clause in citing employers that have allowed employees to be exposed to potential serious harm from excessively hot work environments.

OSHA guidance for employers

OSHA offers some guidance for "acceptable methods for employers to reduce heat stress hazards in the workplace," including, but not limited to:

1. permitting workers to drink water at liberty;
2. establishing provisions for a work/rest regimen so that exposure time to high temperatures and/or the work rate is decreased; and
3. developing a heat stress program that incorporates the following:
  • a training program informing employees about the effects of heat stress and how to recognize heat-related illness symptoms and prevent heat- induced illnesses;
  • a screening program to identify health conditions aggravated by elevated environmental temperatures;
  • an acclimation program for new employees or employees returning to work from absences of three or more days;
  • specific procedures to be followed for heat-related emergency situations; and
  • provisions that first aid be administered immediately to employees displaying symptoms of heat-related illness.
OSHA also has published a Heat Stress Card (OSHA Publication 3154), which is a concise summary of factors causing heat stress, symptoms of heat stress, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke and recommendations for employees. It might be a particularly useful workplace poster this summer.

Thermal comfort policy

You should also consider adopting a thermal comfort policy demonstrating your commitment toward protecting the health and safety of your employees during periods of high heat and humidity. Obviously, adjustments should be tailored to the type of industry, standard uniform or attire required, location of work (outdoor vs. indoor), and requisite physicality of labor. Below are some measures under a thermal comfort policy that could be taken when the heat index approaches a dangerous level:

• Maintain effective air conditioning or other cooling devices. Although OSHA has set no boundaries on office temperature, a thermally comfortable work environment not only helps protect employee health and safety but also is simply good business to optimize employee productivity and workplace morale. When appropriate, you should consider distributing portable air-cooling devices, moving desks away from windows, installing effective window shades and ceiling fans, and ensuring cross ventilation.

• Provide an optional relaxed dress code. Allow employees to wear light, well-ventilated, but appropriate attire. FEMA and NYCOEM advise people to wear lightweight, light-colored, loose-fitting clothing that covers as much skin as possible during extreme heat conditions. Note, however, that casual attire allowances raise issues relating to gender discrimination (e.g., permitting women but not men to wear flip-flops or tank tops). It's recommended that such optional, casual attire policies be gender-neutral and require professional and appropriate clothing.

• Allow flexible work schedules. When possible, allow employees to arrive earlier or stay later to avoid the often sweltering rush-hour commute and maximum heat period during middle and late afternoon. FEMA and NYCOEM advise people to avoid strenuous outdoor activities during the sun's peak hours -- 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

• Allow more frequent rest periods/breaks and provide a ready supply of cold water and cool drinks. Give your employees plenty of opportunities to rest, and provide them with cold water to help them cool down and recharge.

In addition to implementing such mitigating measures, you should have in place a comprehensive emergency preparedness plan that addresses extreme heat and utility/power disruptions. The plan should address preventive measures, test runs, employee education, and emergency response in the event of a heat advisory or warning.

Other potential employment law issues

Extreme heat conditions that cause attendance failures or office closures also raise wage payment and deduction issues under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as well as disability accommodation issues under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state and local disability discrimination laws. While you generally can't reduce an exempt employee's compensation under the FLSA, there are limited exceptions. You should review your policies and practices to ensure compliance with those laws.

For example, in a 2005 opinion letter, the U.S. Department of Labor noted in a specific factual context that when an employee is absent because of inclement weather, such as heavy snow that prevents him from getting to work because of transportation difficulties, he is absent for personal reasons and you may deduct one full day's absence from his salary. Partial- day absences (late arrival or early departure because of weather), however, require a full day's pay for exempt employees. You should consult with your labor counsel before any deductions are made from an exempt employee's salary to avoid jeopardizing his exempt status. The most important thing is to plan ahead for such attendance issues and communicate clear, understandable policies that apply during a heat or other weather emergency.

The ADA or state and local disability discrimination laws may require accommodations to heat-sensitive, qualified, disabled employees. Accommodations could be:

• maintenance of a specific work site temperature;
• use of a cool vest or other cooling clothing;
• use of a personal fan/air conditioner at the workstation;
• allowing flexible scheduling and flexible use of leave time; and
• allowing work from home during hot weather (also pertinent for employees with mobility impairments).

Finally, you should be aware that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) may afford employees certain protections when they band together to protest extreme weather conditions. In one such case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that seven nonunion employees who walked out to protest the company's failure to provide adequate heat were protected under the NLRA.

Plan for The Dog Days

This summer is and will continue to be hot. Protecting your workforce during periods of extreme heat is essential not only for their safety and welfare but also for your company's ability to function. It's important to understand how hot is "too hot" in accordance with heat indexes and OSHA standards and to educate your workforce on the dangers of excessive heat and heat-related illnesses. Developing contingency plans, policies, and procedures to cope with extreme heat conditions that are compliant with labor and employment laws is the first step to avoid being bitten by the dog days of summer.

Tags:
 
"));